The Impact of Creative Climate Dimensions on Individual Innovation Behaviour

Rizgar Saed Hussein,Bahzad Taher Salim,Fatema Mohammed Azo

Soran University,  Erbil Polytechnic University/ RUDN University-Russia, Erbil Polytechnic University-Iraq

DOI: http://doi.org/10.31918/twejer/2253.30

Download Full text





The Impact of Creative Climate Dimensions on Individual Innovation Behaviour

A study of higher education staff at Erbil Polytechnic University and Soran University


Rizgar Saed Hussein

PhD: Business Management

Lecturer: Soran University

 [email protected]


Bahzad Taher Salim

PhD: Innovation management

Lecturer: Erbil Polytechnic University/ RUDN University-Russia

[email protected]


Fatema Mohammed Azo

Master: Applied statistics

Assistant lecturer: Erbil Polytechnic University-Iraq

 [email protected]



The purpose of the study was to examine the impact of creative climate dimensions on individual innovation behaviour. Data were collected from 249 randomly selected respondents for 2021 using a survey questionnaire. Statistical analyses were assessed using, a statistical package for social science (SPSS version 22); Descriptive analysis was done for categorical variables by using frequency and percentage, and Logistic regression analysis was done at the ordinal level to determine the relationship between creative climate and individual innovation behaviour. A descriptive study was organized. The results were drawn based on empirical data collected by university staff. From the results, it can be concluded that the six independent variables under study sufficiently influence individual innovation behaviour. The model is statistically significant, as indicated by the chi-square value (66.066) since the p-value is less than 0.000. As a result, we conclude that the dependent variable and independent factors have a very strong association.  In addition, the model Parallel line test is 0.077, (The null hypothesis states that the location parameters (slope coefficients) are the same across response categories.) this test indicates that we have not violated the assumption.

Keywords: creative climate dimensions, individual innovation behaviour, ordered logit model, Erbil Polytechnic University, Soran University.


-        Anderson, N. R. & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19 (3), 235-258.

-        Andriopoulos, C. (2001). Determinants of organisational creativity: A literature review. Management Decision, 39, 834.

-        Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.

-        Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.

-        Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westward Press.

-        Amabile, T. M., (1997). Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do. California Management Review, 40(1), pp.39–58.

-        Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76, 76.

-        Baloche, L. (2005). Developing cooperative contexts for creativity. In Shepherd, D. (Ed.), Creative Engagements: Thinking with children (pp. 53-60). Oxford, UK: Interdisciplinary Press.

-        Bharadwaj, S. & Menon, A. (2000). Making innovations happen in organizations: Individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 424.

-        Bessant, J. (2005). Enabling continuous and discontinuous innovation: Learning from the private sector. Public Money & Management, Vol. 25, nº. 1, pp. 35-42.

-        Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods. 3rd ed. Cambridge; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

-        Corporate Research Foundation (1996). Corporate strategies of the top 100 UK companies of the future, New York, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.

-        Cummings, A. & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 22-38.

-        Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. 3rd ed.

-        Cook, P. (1998). The creativity advantage - is your organization the leader of the pack? Industrial and Commercial Training, 30, 179.

-        Drucker, P. F. (1986). Management: Task, Responsibilities, Practices, Truman.New York: Talley Books, E. P. Dutton

-        Ekvall, G. (1983). Climate, structure and innovativeness of organizations: a theoretical framework and an experiment. Report 1. Stockholm, Sweden: FA radet, The Swedish council for management and organizational behaviour.

-        Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5 (1), 105-123.

-        EKVALL, G. (1997). Organizational conditions and levels of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6, 195-205.

-        Ekvall G., (1999). Creative Climate. I Runco, M., Pritzker, S. R., (Red) Encyclopedia of Creativity. London, Academic Press. Vol 1 pp 403-412.

-        EKVALL, G. (2002). Organizational conditions and levels of creativity. In J. Henry & D. Mayle (Eds.), Managing innovation and change (pp. 99-110). London: Sage.

-        Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and Creativity in Education and Training in the EU Member States: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC52374_TN.pdf

-        Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112.

-        Goffin, K.; Mitchell, R. (2010). Innovation management. Palgrave-MacMillan.

-        Goffin, K., & Mitchell, R. (2017). Innovation Management: Effective strategy and implementation (Third ed.).

-        Ganzer, P. P., & Chais, C., & Olea, P.M. (2017). Product, process, marketing and organizational innovation in industries of the flat knitting sector. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2017.07.002

-        Hennessey, B. A. (2004). Developing Creativity in Gifted Children: The Central Importance of Motivation and Classroom Climate. http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/reports/rm04202/rm04202.pdf

-        Hendrayati, Heny & Gaffar, Vanessa. (2016). Innovation and Marketing Performance of Womenpreneur in the Fashion Industry in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 219. 299-306. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.04.034.

-        HOSSEINI, H. K., AZAR, A., & ROSTAMY, A. A. (2003). The intervening role of innovative climate: A study of middle managers in manufacturing organizations in Iran. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 3, 151-170.

-        Isaksen, S. & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for Innovation: The Two Faces of Tension in Creative Climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 73.

-        Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G. & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the Best and Worst Climates for Creativity: Preliminary Validation Evidence for the Situational Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 171 - 184.

-        Jordá Borrell, R. (2007). Comportamientos innovadores de las empresas de servicios avanzados (SA). Aprendizaje y entorno en Andalucía. Economía Industrial nº. 363, pp. 205-221.

-        KUENZI, M., & SCHMINKE, M. (2009). Assembling the fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for the organizational work climate literature. Journal of Management, 35, 634-717.

-        KOENE, B. A. S., VOGELAAR, A. L. W., & SOETERS, J. L. (2002). Leadership effects on organizational climate and financial performance: Local leadership effects in chain organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 193-215.

-        Kotler, P., Armstrong, G (2012). Principle of Marketing (14th Ed.). Prentice Hall.

-        Larson, A. (1991). “Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance”. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 6, no. 23, pp. 173-188.

-        Lyons, R. K.; Chatman, J. A.; Joyce, C. K. (2007). Innovation in services: Corporate culture and investment banking. California Management Review, Vol. 50, nº. 1, pp. 174-191.

-        Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2012). Progression in Creativity: Developing new forms of assessment. Background Paper for the OECD conference "Educating for Innovative Societies". http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/29/50153675.pdf

-        Magadley, W. & Birdi, K. (2009). Innovation Labs: An Examination into the Use of Physical Spaces to Enhance Organizational Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 315.

-        Mathisen, G. E. & Einarsen. S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16 (1), 119-140.

-        Mathisen, G. E. & Einarsen, S. (2004). A Review of Instruments Assessing Creative and Innovative Environments Within Organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 119 - 140.

-        MUMFORD, M. D., & GUSTAFSON, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.

-        Puccio, G. J., & Cabra, J. F. (2010). Organizational creativity. In Kaufman, J. C., Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 145-173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

-        Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Capstone Publishing Ltd.

-        SCHNEIDER, B., BRIEF, A. P., & GUZZO, R. A. (1996). Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 7-19.

-        Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

-        Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Boston

-        Schumpeter, J. A. (1951). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

-        Schneider, B. (1987). The People Make the Place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437.

-        Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580- 607.

-        Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (3rd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons., xviii, 582 pp.

-        Van Dyne, L., John, K. A., & Cummings, A. (2002). Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: Individual employee sales and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 57–74

-        Watkin, C. & Hubbard, B. (2003). Leadership motivation and the drivers of share price: the business case for measuring organisational climate. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24, 380.

-        Williams, S. (2001). Increasing employees' creativity by training their managers. Industrial and Commercial Training, 33, 63.

-        Wu, C. H., Parker, S. K., & de Jong, J. P. J. (2014). Need for Cognition as an Antecedent of Individual Innovation Behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511–1534.

-        Zhou, J. & Shalley, C. E. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of Organizational Creativity, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.












ئامانجی ئەم توێژینەوەیە بریتیە لە لێکۆڵینەوە لە کاریگەری ڕەهەندەکانی ژینگەی کاری داهێنەرانە لەسەر ڕەفتاری داهێنانی تاکەکەسی. زانیارییەکان لە 249 کەسی هەڵبژێردراو لە ستافی زانکۆیی و بە شێوەی هەڕەمەکی بۆ ساڵی 2021 بە بەکارهێنانی پرسیارنامەی ڕاپرسی کۆکراوەتەوە. شیکارییە ئامارییەکان بە بەکارهێنانی پاکێجی ئاماری بۆ زانستی کۆمەڵایەتی (SPSS وەشانی ٢٢) ئەنجامدرا؛ شیکاری وەسفکەر بۆ گۆڕاوە پۆلێنییەکان بە بەکارهێنانی فرێکوێنسی و رێژەی سەدی ئەنجامدراوە، و شیکاری لۆجیستیک رێگرێشن لە ئاستی ڕێزبەندیدا ئەنجامدرا بۆ دیاریکردنی پەیوەندی نێوان ژینگەی داهێنەرانە و ڕەفتاری داهێنانی تاکەکەسی. لێکۆڵینەوەیەکی وەسفکەر ڕێکخرا. ئەنجامەکان لەسەر بنەمای زانیارییە ئەزموونییەکان وەرگیراون کە لەلایەن ستاف و کارمەندانی زانکۆی پۆلیتەکنیکی هەولێر و زانکۆی سۆران کۆکراونەتەوە. لە ئەنجامەکانەوە دەتوانرێت بڵێین کە شەش لە گۆڕاوە سەربەخۆکانی ژێر لێکۆڵینەوە، کاریگەرییەکی تەواویان لەسەر هەڵسوکەوتی داهێنانی تاکەکەسی هەیە. مۆدێلەکە لە ڕووی ئامارییەوە گرنگە، وەک لە بەهای کای چوارگۆشە (66.066) ئاماژەی پێکراوە، بەو پێیەی بەهای p کەمترە لە 0.000. لە ئەنجامدا ئێمە بەو دەرئەنجامە گەیشتین کە گۆڕاوی وابەستە و هۆکارە سەربەخۆکان پەیوەندییەکی زۆر بەهێزیان هەیە بەیەکەوە. سەرەڕای ئەوە، تاقیکردنەوەی هێڵی هاوتەریبی مۆدێل بریتیە لە (0.077). (گریمانەی نۆل دەڵێت کە پارامێتەرەکانی شوێن (ڕێژەی مەودا) وەک یەکن لە سەرانسەری پۆلەکانی وەڵامدانەوەدا). ئەم تاقیکردنەوەیە ئاماژەیە بۆ ئەوەی کە ئێمە گریمانەکەمان پێشێل نەکردووە.

وشەی سەرەکی: ڕەهەندەکانی ژینگەی داهێنەرانە، ڕەفتاری داهێنانی تاک، مۆدێلی لۆجیتی ڕێکخراو، زانکۆی پۆلیتەکنیکی هەولێر، زانکۆی سۆران.














كان الغرض من الدراسة هو دراسة تأثير أبعاد المناخ الإبداعي على سلوك الابتكار الفردي. تم جمع البيانات من 249 مستجيبًا تم اختيارهم عشوائيًا لعام 2021 باستخدام استبيان المسح. تم تقييم التحليلات الإحصائية باستخدام الحزمة الإحصائية للعلوم الاجتماعية (الإصدار 22 من SPSS). تم إجراء التحليل الوصفي للمتغيرات الفئوية باستخدام التكرار والنسبة المئوية وتحليل الانحدار اللوجستي على المستوى الترتيبي لتحديد العلاقة بين المناخ الإبداعي وسلوك الابتكار الفردي. نظمت هذه الدراسة كدراسة وصفية. تم رسم النتائج على أساس البيانات التجريبية التي تم جمعها من قبل موظفي جامعة أربيل التقنية و جامعة سوران. من النتائج يمكن استنتاج أن المتغيرات المستقلة الستة قيد الدراسة تؤثر بشكل كافٍ على سلوك الابتكار الفردي. النموذج ذو دلالة إحصائية، كما يتضح من قيمة مربع كاي (66.066)، حيث أن قيمة p أقل من 0.000. نتيجة لذلك، نستنتج أن المتغير التابع والعوامل المستقلة لها هناك ارتباط قوي جدًا. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، فإن اختبار الخط المتوازي النموذجي هو (0.077)، (تنص الفرضية الصفرية على أن معلمات الموقع (معاملات الميل) هي نفسها عبر فئات الاستجابة). يشير هذا الاختبار إلى أننا لم ننتهك الافتراض.

الكلمات المفتاحية: أبعاد المناخ الإبداعي، سلوك الابتكار الفردي، نموذج اللوغاريتم المرتب، جامعة أربيل التقنية، جامعة سوران.